Author Archives: lilia

Media Release: Tree top cheer as Santa Claus visits The Observer Tree

Forest conservationist Miranda Gibson was overjoyed this morning by a surprise visit from Santa Claus to her tree-top platform in Tasmanian’s southern forests.  Today is Ms Gibson’s tenth day in The Observer Tree, where she is remaining to watch over the forest around her which remains under threat from logging.  Mr Claus brought gifts and messages of support from the community.  They shared a picnic lunch complete with Mrs Claus’s homemade plum pudding.

“Today’s visit from Santa was a great surprise” said Ms Gibson.  “I have made a commitment  to stay up in this tree to watch over this forest and to hold Julia Gillard accountable to the promise she made to protect this area. However, it is hard to be away from my family and friends at Christmas. It’s nice to know that Santa has paid me a special visit to wish me luck with the campaign.”

“I have asked Santa for a special gift this year – the protection of Tasmania’s ancient forests as was promised by Julia Gillard earlier this year. He said that although he can’t promise anything, he will try his best” said Ms Gibson.

“I have travelled all around the globe and these forests here in Tasmania are world-class. I am very disappointed in Julia Gillard’s behaviour this year. The destruction of this unique ecosystem is an international disgrace. These are the most precious gifts we have on earth and we need to take care of them for the children of the next generation” said Mr Claus.

Miranda’s Daily Blog – Day 9

What an amazing day! The announcement released this morning that International Plywood is suspending their contract with Ta Ann could not have made me happier! Everything I wrote in my blog last night about staying hopeful … well, now is definitely the time to be hopeful!

The company is the UK purchaser of Ta Ann’s veneer. Recently ENGO Markets For Change released a report which showed clear evidence linking Tasmanian high conservation value forests going to Ta Ann and being sold in the UK for use in the Olympic training stadium for Team USA.

With this evidence in hand representatives of Markets For Change and also grassroots forest group Huon Valley Environment Centre met with International Plywood to show the reality behind Ta Ann’s veneer. The company also received correspondence from the Tasmanian Deputy Premier Bryan Green, claiming that Ta Ann’s practices were environmentally sustainable and that everything would be sorted out soon through the forest peace talks. However, International Plywood was clearly able to see through the forest industry propaganda. I guess the saying goes “pictures speak louder than words.” And it is hard to look at an image of a Tasmanian clearfell smoldering in the place where pristine forest once stood and then call it ‘world’s best practice.’

The decision made by International Plywood is a hopeful sign of a worldwide trend of consumers and business becoming increasingly aware of where products are coming from.  On an international level it seems people no longer wish to buy products that are destroying the environment. As Ian Atwood of International Plywood said “We’re not there to, you know, to savage the forests. We’re here to try and buy product in a responsible manner” (ABC News)

This is great news for the forest campaign in Tasmania and is one step closer to seeing the forest protected. If Ta Ann were not greedily consuming 330,000 cubic meters of wood each year, than this forest would be able to receive the protection it deserves. The suspension of their UK contract will be felt by Ta Ann for sure. But they still have markets in Europe and Japan. So now is the perfect time to turn our attention there and see if the same results can be achieved.

Recently Jenny Weber from the Huon Valley Environment Center went to Japan with former Greens leader Peg Putt to meet with the Japanese companies purchasing from Ta Ann. The company representatives showed concern about the environmental destruction taking place to produce the products they are purchasing. And further evidence and information will be provided to them about what is going on. We are going to be talking to forest campaigners in Japan about setting up an online action – so watch this space for more details about that soon.

The idea of targeting the market in order to create change is not a new one, and companies have been the target of many lobbying and direct action efforts over the years. Internationally this  has proven to be an effective tool in achieving environmental outcomes.  Now with the solid evidence that has come from the months and months of research done by Markets For Change, people all around Australia can take part in a co-ordinated effort. It is often the point at which the final product is sold to consumers where change is most easy to effect. Ta Ann itself can sometimes seem immune to pressure from ENGOs. But in reality they are vulnerable because they use the idea of a clean green image to sell their product, marketing it as “eco-ply.”  Hiding behind the PEFC certification label is yet another tactic to mislead the public into believing that their practices are sustainable. This certification system is considered by ENGOs such as WWF and Greenpeace to be absolutely inadequate, failing to protect threatened species, old growth forests and rare ecosystems. A major problem with PEFC is that is basically leaving the forest industry to regulate itself, because it lacks in independent assessment or on the ground checkups. It is also heavily controlled by people who are a part of the forestry industry or major forestry landholders. The results of PEFC certification are clear considering that Ta Ann are able to receive the label, yet their practices here are causing complete environmental devastation.

Forestry Tasmania are clearly feeling concerned about the success of the markets campaign in the UK. Normally I wouldn’t worry too much about responding to FT’s media releases, but today’s provides such interesting and perplexing quotes that I thought I’d share some of them with you. I think the quote of the day would have to be “if you were concerned about the planet you would buy timber from Tasmania.”  The other interesting suggestion is that you would also buy from Ta Ann “because Ta Ann is using a raw material that would otherwise be exported as woodchip.” Hold on a minute…I thought there wasn’t much of a market for Tasmania’s old growth wood chips these days… isn’t that the reason Gunns Ltd sold all of their woodchip mills and moved on out of native forests? Isn’t that the reason also that hundreds of thousands of logs are sitting around right now in stockpiles, not being sold to anyone? The recent schedulers report that was released a few days ago clearly stated peeler billets/veneer as the reason why Forestry Tasmania claim they need to log this area along with over 30 coupes that were meant to be under a conservation agreement. Ta Ann are driving the native forest logging industry in Tasmania.

The work done by Markets For Change to provide information to the company has also taken a global focus, including a focus on the logging in Borneo by Ta Ann. Their report prepared for International Plywood called on the company to not only stop sourcing timber from Ta Ann, but also “end the use of timber products coming from all intact natural rainforests and timber products from the habitat of endangered species.”   I think that it is vital in any work that we are doing as forest campaigners to ensure that by protecting the forest here we are not just pushing the industry into other areas of significant forest around the globe. That is also one of the inspiring things about the Ta Ann campaign is being able to stand in solidarity with the people of Sarawak in their battle against Ta Ann. Hopefuly International Plywood’s announcement will be the first step towards creating a change not only in Tasmania, but across the world.

Today’s news has certainly brightened up my festive season! And while feeling uplifted I spent a bit of time getting my tree ready for Christmas 🙂 Thanks to the people that sent me out some solar powered Christmas lights. I’m sitting beneath the sparkling and glittering crown of my tree. And it’s beginning to feel a lot like Christmas…..

Check out the photos below.

Hope you are all having an enjoyable festive season too. Take care and I’ll talk to you tomorrow.

Miranda

Daily Podcast Interviews with Miranda in the ObserverTree (#1)

Click on the links to listen to podcast interviews with Miranda Gibson in the ObserverTree, produced by the Earth Matters Show at 3CR:

Observer Tree Podcast 14/12/11
DAY 1
– About the Observer Tree & why Miranda is there, the Intergovernmental Agreement & illegal logging, update on nearby logging activities.

Observer Tree Podcast 15/12/11
DAY 2
– Update on nearby logging activities, anecdotes on daily life in the Observer Tree & Miranda’s background as an activist.

Observer Tree Podcast 16/12/11
DAY 3
– Update on nearby logging activities, Intergovernmental Agreement & Industry Compensation, anecdotes on daily life in the Observer Tree.

Observer Tree Podcast 17/12/11
DAY 4
– Observer Tree Community Day, Brisbane live video link-up, Forest Agreement negotiation process, Ta Ann & green washing, working activists & logging workers in the 21st century.

Media Release: 22/12/2011: Still Wild Still Threatened welcomes UK boycott of Ta Ann’s forest destruction.

Today the good news was announced that UK company International Plywood has made a decision to suspend purchasing wood products from Ta Ann Tasmania. This was the result of a visit from representatives of Markets for Change and the Huon Valley Environment Center, who showed evidence of Ta Ann’s destruction of high conservation value forests in Tasmania.

“International Ply’s decision is a great victory for the forests of Tasmania. It is a real indication that people across the world are committed to purchasing wood products that are truly sustainable and do not come from the decimation of world-class native forests” Said Miranda Gibson, spokesperson for Still Wild Still Threatened.

“Today is my ninth day living 60 meters up in this giant tree in the middle of a forest that should be protected, but is being allowed to be logged to provide wood to Ta Ann. This tree sit – The ObserverTree- has begun to receive global attention. This growing international support is reflected in today’s announcement. Customers and businesses around the world do not want to buy wood from Tasmania’s irreplaceable forests” said Ms Gibson.

The Prime Minister has failed to honor her promise to protect these world-class forests and destructive logging operations continue in order to supply Ta Ann. Now it is time for Julia Gillard to step in line with the rest of the world and protect Tasmania’s high conservation value forests” said Ms Gibson.

Check out Markets For Change report: Team USA training on Tamanian forest destruction.

Read more in the ABC online news article by Conor Duffey.

For more information on Ta Ann also check out this report by the Huon Valley Environment Center: Behind the Veneer- Ta Ann Tasmania’s lies.

Miranda’s Daily Blog – Day 8

Day 8 – It’s been just over a week now that I’ve been sitting here in this tree in an area we have come to call “Julia’s Forest.” The most incredible part of the experience has been the messages and phone calls that have been bursting with inspiration, enthusiasm and passion. This has been so uplifting, especially those messages from people who have worked tirelessly for so long to protect the forest, many of whom have become weary and disheartened by the roller coaster ride of fresh hopes followed by broken promises.

It all started getting close to two years ago now. The forest industry was in crisis. The international market was becoming less tolerant of paper and wood products coming from Tasmania’s old growth. This was one factor in a range of forces that lead to the industry coming to the table to be a part of the “forest peace talks” as they were to become known as.

Industry bodies, union reps and greenies were sitting down together talking. As strange as it seemed, it made sense. Because really we have more in common than maybe we realise. What environmentalists want is what most people want, after all, right? A future. A future with clean air and clean water and a climate that we can survive in. And what forest industry workers want is a future too.  I can’t claim to know what other people really want, but I imagine that it’s something along the lines of a future where there is work for themselves and for the next generation. These things don’t have to be incompatible. And it seemed like a whole new realisation was being made along those lines. Everybody’s future depended on a change in the industry, shifting out of native forest destruction.

Then the announcement came that Gunns Ltd, the biggest woodchipper in Tassie, was exiting from native forest logging. Tasmania’s forests were still being decimated at the same rate as ever, but now the end seemed in sight. So we waited.

Finally, October 2010: The Statement of Principles was announced, which included a moratorium on 572,000 hectares. Within 90 days logging would cease in that area for the duration of the verification process, which would lead to formal protection. Time to celebrate!  I imagined the day when we would soon be packing up Camp Floz- no longer needing to blockade to defend the Upper Florentine Valley. Every one was talking about the good news!!

Yet, something wasn’t quite right. The machines were still in the forest. And not only were they not moving from areas they were in – they were starting new ones, and to top it all off, they were building more roads! New logging roads being built into areas that weren’t going to be logged? No, something just didn’t seem to add up.

… Did we say 90 days? Um, no what we meant was, really, 90 days from when the government announces their support for the Statement of Principles, not 90 days from the signing of it……

Ok, so good to clear that up. Now we just had to wait for the pollies to get their act together.

Dec 14th 2010: Tasmanian Premier David Bartlett announces their support for the Statement of Principles, in full, including the Moratorium to be implemented within 90 days.  This gave Forestry Tasmania plenty of time to get organised and reschedule out of logging coupes, shifting workers located to other sites. But Forestry Tasmania just didn’t seem to be moving – there was no progress being made. The deadline for the moratorium, March 15th, loomed ever closer. Was FT going to suddenly be able to reschedule all those coupes at the last minute? Why weren’t they moving any contractors out by now? All these questions began to arise and no one could give a straight answer.

Still Wild Still Threatened worked on documenting the coupes within the 572,000 in our local area (the Derwent region). We assessed which coupes were being logged and also surveyed those areas that were left for their conservation value. I spend a lot of time in amazing areas of old growth that we have left, see, these are the places I spend most of my time. And so, in a way, I guess I’d almost come to take it for granted. This documentation process really brought it home to me how rare and precious those areas are how quickly they are disappearing.

Most places we surveyed were being logged.

March 15th 2011:  The day came and went… The bulldozers and chainsaws ceaselessly continued. Hectares upon hectares of forest that was meant to be protected was felled.

But the act of bad faith on the part of Forestry Tasmania and the State and Federal government did not go unnoticed. March 15th was the beginning of 10 days of action held by the Huon Valley Environment Center and Still Wild Still Threatened.  In addition to actions in the forest, every  day for 10 days community members stood outside the office of Lara Giddings and maintained a vigil.  The 10 days rolled on into 10 weeks. We jokingly suggested announcing a “10 years of action” – but hoped it wouldn’t come down to that. The sinking feeling in our hearts reminding us that the forest doesn’t actually have 10 years left to wait.

August 2011: This is where Julia’s promise comes in. After a process facilitated by government appointed Bill Kelty, which brought together the interests of all negotiating parties, an agreement was signed. This was called the Tasmanian Forest Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA). As those who are following this blog would know by now, this was full of promise for the forest. Even stronger than a moratorium- this time there was promise of an immediate conservation agreement would be placed on the area ear-marked for protection. By this time the area had been reduced by over 140,000 hectares, though those areas not covered by the conservation agreement could still have a chance of formal protection through the verification process, if there was anything left of them by then. Still Wild Still Threatened and the Huon Valley Environment Center had serious concerns about this reduction to 430,000 hectares. In fact we took our message straight to Parliament House in Canberra, making it clear to the Prime Minister that our forests needed a better deal.

A common questions asked by the media these days is something along the lines of – but shouldn’t you be willing to compromise? But you see, if they could only see the areas of forest and the areas of clearfell that I have seen then perhaps this concept of ‘compromise’ would take on a different meaning. It is those of us who spend our time traipsing about in the forest on a day to day basis who know what it really means for even a hectare to  be taken off the agenda, let alone 140,000.  And now, for logging to continue and we are losing more and more from the 430,00 hectares as we speak. When you live in these forests you begin to realise what it really means for that big old tree over there with the hollows in it to be felled and burnt. What it means for that Tasmanian Devil, the one with the little spot on the left side of it’s bottom, that visits the same spot every few days… you  begin to realise what it really means here in the forest to compromise. And quiet frankly, the forest cannot afford anymore compromises. It has been doing so for decades. The industry has made no compromises, however… it seems they are able to continue with business as usual. in fact, they’re doing even better than business as usual. You could say they got to have their cake and eat it to. For example, Forestry was given millions of dollars of tax payers money to reschedule coupes, then they still get to log those coupes. It doesn’t take a mathematician to tally up the checks and balances and see that the it is the forest that has done all the compromising. Especially when you take into account the fact that despite this whole process, not one single hectare has been protected.

So, that just about takes us up to the present. Four months passed since Julia made that announcement . And even though there were some flaws in the agreement, the least she could have done, really, is actually implement it!

I couldn’t help it…. once again i got my hopes up that this was it – a conservation agreement would be announced and we could step back and take a breath. I thought of all the areas of forest that I love so much…. the Styx, Counsel, Tyenna, Upper Florentine… Soon they would be safely guarded by a conservation agreement and waiting for the day when they would be formally declared national parks and world heritage areas.

Today, not one hectare is protected and logging is due to continue in over 30 coupes, including this one. You can see why it has been a tough year.

And so that brings me to where I started this blog…. I wanted to write this message to all of you out there who care about this forest, especially those of you weighed down by broken promises.. don’t give up. We cannot afford to. These forests are too precious, too unique, too irreplaceable, to give up now. I know it’s hard to hold onto a sense of hope after so many let downs, but I think that there is still reason to be hopefully. I think something is beginning…. I can sense it in the emails and messages I have received this past week. A new spark seems to be emerging and now is the time, more than ever to give it the best we’ve got.  Julia Gillard, Ta Ann, Forestry Tasmania, and all those responsible for the decimation of our precious natural heritage….they will know soon enough that we will not tolerate it. And that change needs to come now, before our forests are lost forever.

Till tomorrow, Miranda.

P.S:  For anyone wondering what you can do to help. Here a few small suggestions. Feel free to add more ideas in your comments….
Post and share our introduction video like crazy on face book, email and on any other websites you can.  The more people watch it the more we can get the message out there. As well as showing to the government that we have the support and interest of a large amount of people. We have reached over 1000 views now. Lets get even more – next lets aim for 10,000!
“Like” the Facebook page and get your friends to do  so too. This also helps us show that we have a large amount of people supporting this campaign.
Host a community forum or a get together with people to live-chat with me. I am happy to talk to people about what is going on here, answer questions and have a chat.
Put up posters around your town, hand out flyers, hold a stall. Go to the Take Action page of our website for downloadable copies.
Write an article and get it out there – in a newsletter, local paper, magazine – any where you can.
Write to the Prime Minister.
Donate to help us keep this project running – you will find a link on the Take Action page.
Do an action in your city to highlight what is going on.
Contact companies that are purchasing products from our native forests

Miranda’s Daily (Video) Blog – Day 7

Watch Miranda’s Day 7 Blog on video and get a tour of daily life up in the ObserverTree:

Miranda’s Daily Blog – Day 6

Day 6 – Following on from yesterdays blog – today a report was released that makes it quiet clear that Ta Ann are one of the driving forces behind the on-going destruction of high conservation value forests.

The Report of Independent Expert Schedulers: appointed under the Tasmanian Forests Inter-Governmental Agreement was released today by Tasmanian Senator Richard Colbeck. The report was developed as part of the IGA process, Forestry Tasmania claimed that they were unable to reschedule logging operations out of the 430,000 hectares ear-marked for protection. This lead to independent verifiers to asses these claims and produce this report.

The report indicated that Forestry Tasmania did indeed have intentions to log at least 34 coupes in the area that is meant to be under a conservation agreement. The report indicated that contracts, one of the major ones being with Ta Ann, could not be met outside of the proposed reserve area.

This report confirms that Ta Ann are a major blocker to forest protection due to their contract for 265,000 cubic metres of wood a year, which is unable to be met outside of the area allocated for protection. In fact, the report proved that a much larger amount of forest is going to Ta Ann than this, because to produce 265,000 cubic meters of peeler billets they are actually taking 330,000 cubic meters of wood.

It will be interesting to see if Forestry Tasmania attempts to use this report to justify their continued logging in high conservation value areas. Rather then provide a reason to continue forest destruction this report provides evidence that the government must now use to enact Clause 27 of the IGA. This clause in the agreement states that if contracts cannot be meet outside the 430,000 hectares then compensation would be given instead. There is no option in this agreement for logging to continue in those areas, regardless of the contracts. The contractual requirements of Forestry Tasmania will be fulfilled through the compensation process.

It is the failure of Forestry Tasmania to do adequate preparation for rescheduling that has lead to this situation where contracts are not able to be meet elsewhere. They were given the work to a long time ago, yet have not managed to reschedule any significant number of operations. This is interesting considering they were recently given millions of dollars of tax payers money to do this work! In fact millions they received was taken out of the budget that had been allocated to oversee conservation outcomes and manage the new reserves. How ironic that it went instead to FT, who have done nothing but continue to log in areas that are meant to be protected by a conservation agreement by now.

It is interesting too that Senator Colbeck claims the IGA to be a sham. The only thing that is making the IGA a sham right now is the fact that the government has failed to actually implement any of the conservation outcomes that are clearly outline in it.

Senator Colbeck claims that there “will never be peace” due to protest actions by myself and other environment groups. I would say that it is the bulldozers and chainsaws that are ripping apart this valley that are disrupting the peace, wouldn’t you? My presence here is simply documenting and exposing that disruption to the world. It would seem that the real culprit in this situation is Julia Gillard, signing a deal and then not honouring it is certainly one way to destabilise the integrity of the entire IGA process. And so, yes, I would agree with Senator Colbeck on that point – the IGA is in risk of being a complete sham.

All this talk of “peace” in the forests takes on a whole new meaning when you sit here in the middle of a logging coupe and day after day hear the sound of trees falling. There will be no peace in the forests for the Tasmanian devils, spotted tailed quolls or white goshawks… there will be no peace in the forests for these 400 year old trees… there will be no peace in the forest for me here in this tree-sit… so long as the chainsaws continue.

Till tomorrow – take care. Miranda.

Download Schedulers Report

Tree sitter calls on government to act on rescheduler’s report and deliver conservation agreement

Media Release: 19/12/2011

Tasmanian forest activist Miranda Gibson has called for the Tasmanian and Commonwealth governments to take urgent action after the release of an Independent Expert Schedulers report into the logging of forests within 430,000 hectares earmarked for immediate protection.

Tasmaian Senator Richard Colbeck today released the report which indicates that Forestry Tasmania intend to log at least 34 coupes within the 430,000 hectares of high conservation value forest that Julia Gillard promised would be immediately protected.

‘It is now crucial for the Federal and State Governments to honour their own commitment and provide compensation in order to save these thousands of hectares of forest from immanent destruction,’ treesitter and Still Wild Still Threatened spokesperson, Miranda Gibson said.

‘Forestry Tasmania can no longer hide their logging behind the excuse of contractual obligations. Clause 27 of the Intergovernmental Agreement states unequivocally that 430,000 hectares of identified high conservaton value forests must be immediately protected and that any contracts unable to be met from outside this area, such as those listed in this report, must instead be compenstated’ Miranda Gibson said.

‘Pro-logging interests are seeking to manipulate the findings of this report to undermine the agreement, yet they have the gall to attack environmental campaigners who are simply asking the Government honor its own word,’ Miranda Gibson said.

“Today is my sixth day living in a tree-site in the middle of a logging coupe that slated for immanent logging. Through my daily blog, I have been able to show the world not only the conservation value of this unique forest but also the devastating impact of logging that is occurring. The irreparable damage being done to this area of forest is completely unacceptable and a breach of the IGA” said Ms Gibson.

Miranda’s Daily Blog – Day 5

Day 5 – Why would the Prime Minister risk the controversial act of breaking her own promise and allowing logging here? This was a question I was asked yesterday and yes… I was wondering the same thing! Only Julia can know her own motivations, but I have a sneaking suspicion it might have something to do with Ta Ann – a company fast becoming known as “the new Gunns,” due to their position as the driving force behind logging in Tasmania since Gunns Ltd took a step back.

Ta Ann are a Malaysian company based in Sarawak. They started operations here five years ago, with an attractive deal from our government – the offer of wood prices far below the cost of logging in their own country. Executive Chairman Datuk Hamed Sepawi told the media that rates were lower in Tasmania than Malaysia or Indonesia. While the company is by no means poor (being part of a corrupt network of companies under the control of the wealthy Taib family) their operations in Tasmania are propped up by tax payers money. Not only do they get the wood at rock bottom prices they also receive tax payer funded subsidies. Despite this they still managed to record an $18 million loss last year.

The company has a deplorable record internationally. They are responsible for the displacement of Indigenous people in Sarawak to secure access to forests for logging. The company should not be welcomed in Tasmania, let alone supported by tax payers money.

Ta Ann is now a major driver of forest destruction in Tasmania, with their contract of 265,000 cubic metres of wood per year now being used as an excuse for continued logging in high conservation value areas ear-marked for protection. The contract lasts until 2027, though the government has also given an option of a 15 year extension. The company has lobbied Forestry Tasmania (FT) and the government to secure on-going wood supply, undermining the Statement Of Principles and the Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA). When the IGA was announced FT managing director Bob Gordon claimed forest protection could not be achieved due to 59 logging coupes on the plan that were “critical to the supply of logs to Ta Ann.”

Ta Ann’s continued pressure on the government for access to native forest is a major block in Tasmania moving forward. These past 2 years during the negotiation process the Tasmanian community has shown determination to see an end to the so-called “forest conflict” that has gone on for generations – by moving out of an unsustainable native forest logging industry. It seems now that the only thing holding us back is a Malaysian company that is hell-bent on destroying the forests at no benefit (financial, social, environmental or otherwise) to the Tasmanian community. That and a government that appears to lack the back bone to stand up to them.

Writing this has felt like “extreme blogging!” I’m sitting here gripping tight as I write. My tarp like a wild animal trying to free itself from the ropes holding it down… the wind plunging it this way and that. The noise deafening. The tree is swaying … the movement intensified by the counteracting sway of near-by trees, so that the whole forest itself seems to be in motion. Although it feels hectic, it also makes me feel like a part of this landscape as it heaves and moves in the wind, taking me along for the ride. It seems impossible to imagine one day the wind might whip up these slopes and touch no trees, stirring only the ash from a burnt out and lifeless clearfell.

Please take action to help make sure this tree I’m sitting in doesn’t end up as veneer flooring beneath your feet. Thank you for following my blog. I’ll be updating with more about Ta Ann and the forest negotiations over time. For now check out this article that appeared this week in the Asia Sentinel.

Talk to you tomorrow ~ Miranda.

Mount Mueller and the ObserverTree

Check out this incredible photo taken by Alan Lesheim of Mount Mueller, showing the position of the ObserverTree (click on image for larger version)…